In the Netherlands there has developed a practice regarding the Arms of Basilicas to display the Ombrellino in Saltire with a Tintinnabulum on a Chief. Under this a field per pale dexter with the Symbol of the Saint to which the Basilica is dedicated and on the sinister the Arms of the Locality of the Basilica. If the Basilica also is a Cathedral a Mitre is added over the Ombrellino and Tintinnabulum. A Motto Scroll is also mostly to be seen.
St Pancratius Basilica in Tubbergen.
St Walburgis Basilica in Arnhem.
Arms of Dutch Basilicas
- Chris Green
- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 10 Jul 2012, 13:06
- Location: Karlstad, Sweden
Re: Arms of Dutch Basilicas
Such minor basilicas seem to be a sort of promotion for an otherwise ordinary Roman Catholic church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_basilica
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_basilica
Chris Green
IAAH President
Bertilak de Hautdesert
IAAH President
Bertilak de Hautdesert
- Torsten Laneryd
- Posts: 102
- Joined: 12 Sep 2012, 22:45
- Location: Sweden
Re: Arms of Dutch Basilicas
It does not look like a chief to me, nor is it slightly per fess enhanced. May a heraldic artist take such free choices, or isn't the blazon a chief
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012, 13:00
- Location: Germany
Re: Arms of Dutch Basilicas
Torsten Laneryd wrote:It does not look like a chief to me, nor is it slightly per fess enhanced. May a heraldic artist take such free choices, or isn't the blazon a chief
It looks like three arms quartered together in an unusual way to me. From an artistic view, I don't think it was a good idea to make the chief so big. After all, the bottom half is already smaller, due to the shape of the shield, and then contains two designs impaled.
- Michael F. McCartney
- Posts: 437
- Joined: 24 Apr 2015, 23:34
Re: Arms of Dutch Basilicas
Would be interesting to see the actual written blazon, assuming there is one, and then a translation into English or French by a competent bilingual heraldic artist or scholar.
FWIW it looks to me like per fess and in base per pale... not the most attractive arrangement but not unique. The spacing is essentially the same as the 3rd and 4th quarters of a quartered shield; but the undivided upper half is to me visually much heavier (what's a better term?) than if the shield was actually quartered, with two separate fields in chief.
FWIW it looks to me like per fess and in base per pale... not the most attractive arrangement but not unique. The spacing is essentially the same as the 3rd and 4th quarters of a quartered shield; but the undivided upper half is to me visually much heavier (what's a better term?) than if the shield was actually quartered, with two separate fields in chief.
Michael F. McCartney
Fremont, California
Fremont, California
- JMcMillan
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 13 Jul 2012, 22:33
- Location: United States
Re: Arms of Dutch Basilicas
I agree about the unpleasant artistic effect of a per fess partition rather than an actual chief. Beyond that, I would suggest that the principle by which these are composed is not good heraldry. The ombrellino and tintinnabulum would work better as external additaments--in fact, at least in the United States, what distinguishes the arms of a basilica is the ombrellino placed palewise behind the shield. And using the symbol of the patron saint impaling the arms of the municipality where the church is located feels like a misappropriation of the civic arms. It would be better to compound the charges from the saintly and civic arms in some fashion to make a single unified coat.
Joseph McMillan
Alexandra, Virginia, USA
Alexandra, Virginia, USA
- JMcMillan
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 13 Jul 2012, 22:33
- Location: United States
Re: Arms of Dutch Basilicas
As an illustration of the use of the ombrellino as an additament, here are the arms of the Cathedral-Basilica of the Immaculate Conception in Mobile, Alabama, USA.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Joseph McMillan
Alexandra, Virginia, USA
Alexandra, Virginia, USA
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012, 13:00
- Location: Germany
Re: Arms of Dutch Basilicas
JMcMillan wrote:I agree about the unpleasant artistic effect of a per fess partition rather than an actual chief. Beyond that, I would suggest that the principle by which these are composed is not good heraldry. The ombrellino and tintinnabulum would work better as external additaments--in fact, at least in the United States, what distinguishes the arms of a basilica is the ombrellino placed palewise behind the shield. And using the symbol of the patron saint impaling the arms of the municipality where the church is located feels like a misappropriation of the civic arms. It would be better to compound the charges from the saintly and civic arms in some fashion to make a single unified coat.
Return to “Ecclesiastical Heraldry”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests