GJKS wrote:Jonathan Webster wrote:... rather than her son who would quarter them 2 and 4 with the arms of his father 1 and 3.
Surely that should read, respectively, '2 & 3' and '1 & 4'?
Yes, yes it should.
GJKS wrote:Jonathan Webster wrote:... rather than her son who would quarter them 2 and 4 with the arms of his father 1 and 3.
Surely that should read, respectively, '2 & 3' and '1 & 4'?
Chris Green wrote:Here's the latest from the BBC on the royal succession:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21119034
Why not just those who are HRH? That seems a bit more logical.
But why 6? Is 6th much more likely to become monarch than 7th?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests