My company has decided to boost morale with a less-than-optional costume party this Hallowe'en.
With no better options having presented themselves, I have decided to go as a medieval knight. Since I have assumed arms (which most of my coworkers have seen over my desk anyway), and since I have ready access to a seamstress (my wife’s aunt), I have might as well go all-in and wear a heraldically correct surcoat. Right?
From what I can gather, a proper surcoat extended about mid-calf to knee-length, had slits in the bottom front and back (to facilitate wear on horseback), and was without sleeves (with sleeves would be a tabard, worn by my livery).
Their historical purpose was to protect the armor from baking in direct sun, and to keep it from corroding from the rain and muck of the battlefield. (that doesn’t effect my costume, just more background info.)
The surcoat was also emblazoned with the same design as the shield to aide in his battlefield identification.
Arms of Sir Thomas Erpingham (1357-1428 ); and Sir Thomas at Agincourt, 1415:
I am assuming that the design would have also been repeated on the back as well. Since my arms are symmetrical, I don’t have to worry about which way the design on the back would “respect”.
Is that all more-or-less correct? Any additional information would be most welcomed!
Halloween 2012
- steven harris
- Posts: 170
- Joined: 11 Jul 2012, 12:22
- Location: Pomfret, Connecticut
Halloween 2012
Steven A. Harris, Fellow
IAAH member since February 2008
https://goo.gl/btEhVg
IAAH member since February 2008
https://goo.gl/btEhVg
- Chas Charles-Dunne
- Posts: 624
- Joined: 10 Jul 2012, 15:48
- Location: England - TL 80102 93862
- Contact:
Re: Halloween 2012
I am assuming that the design would have also been repeated on the back as well. Since my arms are symmetrical, I don’t have to worry about which way the design on the back would “respect”.
I don't think you would have to worry about respecting. That was a concept that was introduced or invented long after surcoats stopped being used.
Regards
Chas
IAAH Fellow
Chas
IAAH Fellow
- Chris Green
- Posts: 3628
- Joined: 10 Jul 2012, 13:06
- Location: Karlstad, Sweden
Re: Halloween 2012
The most important question is the one you haven't asked! What material should be used? Clearly nothing involving polyester or other synthetic materials. Egyptian cotton would be eminently suitable, though rather expensive I imagine. Cotton from somewhere else would be quite acceptable, as would hessian/burlap. Silk would be great, but I don't imagine that knights used silk for combat (are you intending to fight anyone at this party?). Wool would be OK if you kept your chevauchee indoors. I would favour wadmal, but it was never popular outside the nordic lands.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wadmal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wadmal
Chris Green
IAAH President
Bertilak de Hautdesert
IAAH President
Bertilak de Hautdesert
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012, 13:00
- Location: Germany
Re: Halloween 2012
What are you going to do for armor?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests